2014-08-20, 04:14 PM
y0y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:I'm sorry what? Why exactly are you pretending to know *anything* about my life? Are these the same sort of apparently misguided assumptions that you're making about this story? And, at that, how does my life have anything to do with this? You wouldn't know anything about my life, so that's not really something you can discuss, to be honest.
Because your response was not outright denial but rather a deflection that my assumption is true. Plus I mean, man, it's obvious.
y0y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:An issue to...whom, exactly? The journalism company, the misters, the ex, and her? How does that concern the rest of the internet?
...I'm not sure how to tell you this but the internet, has a big community and involvement in this entertainment like system, called VIDEO FCUKING GAMES. When you have SOURCES OF INFORMATION that help you DETERMINE if a game is purchasable or not based on your f`ucking criteria, and some swamp ass got his c`ock sucked to say that it fits all your goddamn criteria I as the consumer, am being f`ucking scammed.
Not only that but what about the real female game devs who STRUGGLE to get into this line of work, only to be shunned as a "possible zoe f`uck up", as sh`it like this just slander and encourages the sexist/sexism stereotypes in the establishment currently. In fact, this women is ass backwards as she RAMMED an entire foundation into the ground because she felt she was entitled to be paid for her ideas, when the guidelines perfectly stated its charitable. And if an entire news organization is going to sit here and feed me hand picked sh`it based on the best (and probably very limited) p`ussy they get, then they should be working for goddamn penthouse, not be one of the sources of information for things I don't have access too.
Here I'll summarize for you;

