2014-08-20, 03:05 PM
y0y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:If people are so worried about the negative backlash this could have on the gaming industry, why would people bring this much attention to it? There's a rather large logical inconsistency there that I seem to be missing.
....By your logic any form of corruption should be completely ignored, what? THE ACT AND THE EXPLICIT ABILITY TO EXERCISE ACT IS BAD.
y0y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:I think the main thing here is that people are acting as if sex is the be-all-end-all for everyone. If I'm friends with someone and I have sex with them, how does that suddenly discredit my entire relationship with them? The next time they give me praises, it must have only been because I had sex with them.
This is GAME journalism. Not gossip girl weekly.
Typically when you have sex, and it's the only person you've had sex with, good feelings are then associated with person, which influences judgment, which influences credibility. If they made it a point that they were having an intimate relationship with said person, much like when other people review friends game, they make it a point they are FRIENDS. The context isn't there and it appears unbiased, which by far, it clearly isn't.

