MasPan Wrote:
Shidoshi was a neutral, not a townie. And I DIDN'T vote for Olsi. I also had my vote on Shidoshi FAR before it was even a question of a lynch - I'd be looking at who the second vote was that started the actual bandwagon. If it helps, look at my history in other mafia games - I almost never go with the vote on whoever is currently the center of attention.
I've also come as close to outright stating that I think a mafia pikachu could exist and that I don't buy his claim to be innocent.
We also need to be looking at who hasn't voted at all. If, as you say, the mafia is just capitalizing on chaos, they wouldn't have to vote at all and could just sit back. There's bound to be at least one mafian that hasn't voted both days.
Yes, I messed up he was neutral and not town. I somehow missed that in my notes. Anyway, I'm going to reply to you, Kyrastri, HolyPie and Polantaris next:
Yesterday Olsi was lynched and it all started because of his reaction to Luv's power and we're still discussing whether he's lying or not. That's why I'm thinking that voting Shidoshi and keeping Luv alive is something mafia would do. And I'm not sure I buy the "logistics" thing, Luv was pretty acting pretty scummy day 1 and it seemed like an easy choice to get rid of a mafia or someone that would just end up confusing us.
The only ones that have voted two days are HolyPie, Olsi, Simple, HyperMug, you and me. I know that I'm town, Olsi was town and I'm inclined to believe HolyPie and Hypermug (not too sure though). Simple seems to vote near the end of the day and you're the one who starts votes and could be leading things somewhere that are not beneficial.
As for people who haven't voted at all both days, it's only CakesxD who has been claiming weird stuff, meow who is being pretty random too, Polantaris who so far seems to be town but I could be wrong and y0y0y0shi0. About him, it's the start of his post yesterday that I quote below. Anyone can act "helpful/useful" without actually being it, he's not tunneling like Meta did day 1, but he's being helpful while also leading to the wrong lynchs. I guess it's a gut feeling and not something I can prove easily with his posts.
y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:Olsi, VerrKol, and Meta's posts have all been bugging me. Olsi in particular just seems...off, whereas the other two just sort of seem too...hostile? Assertive?
Kyrastri Wrote:How does luv being chaotic help force mafia to slip up? o-o Actually you might be better off not answering that...
I don't know if I worded it wrong but that's not what I meant at all. It's the other way around, I think Luv being alive is beneficial to the mafia whether he's mafia or not. Yesterday's lynch was because of a misunderstanding between two people who I believe are townies (at least one is confirmed now) regarding Luv's claim, power and day 1 scummyness... while the mafia could sit back and watch us kill either one, and today we're still wondering if he's really mafia or not.
Polantaris Wrote:I'm not that smart, sorry.
- Words - Not sure of the logic that Words is using. Also, Words has directly linked playstyles to how he played when he was mafia...but that just points out how he's playing differently. That doesn't really prove he's not mafia. I feel like he's intentionally pointing out how he played mafia last time, to appear non-mafia because, "Look, I'm playing differently!
I don't see where Verrkol was scummy yesterday, it looked more like a confused town going against another town without knowing. Unless you mean scummy as in "he voted for someone that ended up being innocent". And I feel like the same thing is gonna end up happening today...
EDIT: adding up that I'm