2014-07-16, 07:58 AM
ScottPilgrim Wrote:You know i'm right, just get off Nintendo's D and see them for what they truely are.
Seems age hasn't gained wisdom.
Let me explain the difference;
Call of Duty is a repetitive, hallway type of shooter with very limited diversity. Call of Duty has such obvious patterns, with the prime principle being who has the highest fire rate, that's not even pressing the douche who runs with a shotgun, or the guy who spinelessly hides in a corner.
You're comparing a game with such mediocre content that is recycled every year (The same f`ucking game engine since 2000) and you want to compare that to the titans such as pokemon? You do realize there are two different pokemon teams that kind of frog hop features throughout all the games? You do realize each generation offered entirely different metagames, that X and Y genuinely capitalized on the 3ds? Where even the remade games offer story elements that expand on the previous story?
It isn't "DERRR MOR LEGENDRIIS", its a whole new world (typically) where you CONQUER it, with new strategies and the such. Then you try to compare it to a Mario brand game? The new Mario games are party games, and are made for fun, not really shallow competitive gameplay. I mean at least LoL, although just as repetitive, allows you to play with other characters with vastly different skills.
And megaman? The whole fun part of megaman is the new powers and how to incorporate them in a puzzle like environment, that's the fun with platformers, but they offer new features, new engines and new concepts each generation, you know what call of duty has added? Different kill streak perks, so interesting.
It's a flat out terrible game, played by people ignorant of quality because the game is so similar, you can transfer all of the experience, all of the hours, to the next generation, it's familiar to them.

