2014-07-14, 12:13 AM
ChaoticCJ Wrote:-Niernen was forced to vote for Chaz [Niernen; was this a night action or day action? I am not sure if you said or I missed it.]
I got a PM last night, saying I had to vote for him today.
I went back and checked, but unless I missed something, I did not say I had a forced vote, I originally said I did not have a lot of freedom with my vote. That could be interpreted other ways too, like not being able to vote, not being able to vote for someone, or having to vote for someone. It was a pretty open statement. [MENTION=5839]Chaz[/MENTION]; was the one that called me out and asked who i was "forced" to vote for. No one else had asked what my voting restriction was or who/if I had to vote for someone.
[MENTION=8192]LuvDWayULie[/MENTION]; I pomed you because subbing out is always a last resort and done if a player can not participate. It should not be done because a person has a "mental block" or want's to leave because they think they are getting lynched. Who ever subs in for Chaz would be at an extreme disadvantage. It also ruins the balance since we don't know them or their playstyle. Cakes or Sega was fine since not much had happened, but trying to sub out when you have a giant spotlight on you is different. Like I said before, if he wanted to do it he should have done it when day one ended and he realized he could not play. It is unfair for the sub and other players and just generally a plantain move in this situation.