2014-07-11, 12:57 PM
[MENTION=5147]Sega[/MENTION];'s posts seem more like roleplay of his role than deliberately being bratty. It doesn't help his case.
"Let's lynch Sega, even if he's Town he's not helping." is not a good justification. Even inactive townies help in keeping the mafia from acquiring the majority. If he's really being inactive and weird because of other reasons I'm sure xBTAx will look to sub him out.
[MENTION=8192]LuvDWayULie[/MENTION]; keeps firing off all my "Scum!" alarms just like last game, but for now I'm assuming that's how he plays. He's not stuff for Day 1.
For me, [MENTION=12601]Liable[/MENTION];'s justifications were mostly junk. Just congratulating people on having bred discussion and exposing intentions through voting on him doesn't make his side better when he wasn't the one that made the effort in the first place. [MENTION=5839]Chaz[/MENTION]; at least seemed more sincere and open about his stance. I feel comfortable lynching Liable today.
"Let's lynch Sega, even if he's Town he's not helping." is not a good justification. Even inactive townies help in keeping the mafia from acquiring the majority. If he's really being inactive and weird because of other reasons I'm sure xBTAx will look to sub him out.
[MENTION=8192]LuvDWayULie[/MENTION]; keeps firing off all my "Scum!" alarms just like last game, but for now I'm assuming that's how he plays. He's not stuff for Day 1.
For me, [MENTION=12601]Liable[/MENTION];'s justifications were mostly junk. Just congratulating people on having bred discussion and exposing intentions through voting on him doesn't make his side better when he wasn't the one that made the effort in the first place. [MENTION=5839]Chaz[/MENTION]; at least seemed more sincere and open about his stance. I feel comfortable lynching Liable today.