2014-07-10, 11:11 AM
Liable Wrote:Jeebus, while I was off studying how this glass ball thingy worked(read: while I was enjoying myself on shade) what on earth with all these walls of texts.
I did have a brief read through it (and will leave the complete analysis until day 1 ends) but at this stage I find it to be rather distracting and is only misleading each other with who to be suspicious of (either intentionally or not).
I don't exactly know the play styles of everyone, so without all the prejudice I am rather suspicious of Chaz;. His passive and reluctant stance on picking someone out feels as if he's not willing to reveal any of his motives and just conform and agree with majority (sounds like something a mafia would do). However if I'm counting correctly he's already got 2 votes under his name.
Faonkarino's vote on him is probably just to get a reaction from him, but Meta's follow-up vote without reason is making me rather reluctant to vote. Though given there's enough time for me to remove my vote and to believe my initial gut feel of him [Vote] Chaz
However as repeated several times, a little more input from the inactives (as mentioned by Polantris) would be nice to get a feel of their stance for this game and pick out the most unhelpful player(whether mafia or not).
Also I am not agreeing with anyone. I am playing neutral for first turn unless someone slips up or convinces me that someone has a strong possibility of being a mafia. There a different between agreeing and choosing null.
LuvDWayULie Wrote:I pray that Sega speaks something. I don't wanna lose a Townie just because he's not talking.
And yeah, I do agree that there are quite a few of passive non-night roles.
I Find this silly to just vote on people who don't speak right away.