2014-06-22, 01:58 PM
Here's the problem with the argument;
Everyone and their mother will concede the skill should be changed to fit the standards of what the dev's expect it to actually do. However when you ask or rather, challenge it's existence, and the dev's explain it is not intentional, it is abuse, and exercise self restraint, only to challenge their authority to see if you can get away with it, you will and should get burned.
I don't agree with the management, but the fact you play a game with such ridiculous management, you kind of have to take some self responsibility when you get burned, the management is known for lack of consistency, personal responsibility and flat out told you to exercise self restraint, and you're now complaining about their process?
Everyone and their mother will concede the skill should be changed to fit the standards of what the dev's expect it to actually do. However when you ask or rather, challenge it's existence, and the dev's explain it is not intentional, it is abuse, and exercise self restraint, only to challenge their authority to see if you can get away with it, you will and should get burned.
I don't agree with the management, but the fact you play a game with such ridiculous management, you kind of have to take some self responsibility when you get burned, the management is known for lack of consistency, personal responsibility and flat out told you to exercise self restraint, and you're now complaining about their process?

