2014-04-25, 07:27 PM
How is it interesting? Trying to debunk evolution because there are things that can't be answered YET? So what?
It's not like science is a dogma that can't change no matter what. Eventually we will find more evidence to answer those questions or we will find a new theory that is better, but right now, with the evidence we have this is our best.
The only thing I find mildly "interesting" thing is how the interviewer plays with semantics and abuses epistemology ignorance to make things look in a way that fits his agenda. The one thing that worries me is that someone with a science related major finds this interesting and valid, ignoring things he learned (or should've learned, I hope).
I also love how you just leave the link there without stating your actual opinion because you know that it will get dissected and criticized if there are any flaws (which, by your post history I know there will be) and you don't want an already weak "argument" (or whatever that video is supposed to be) to look worse when you justify it.
Also, wtp is that site?
It's not like science is a dogma that can't change no matter what. Eventually we will find more evidence to answer those questions or we will find a new theory that is better, but right now, with the evidence we have this is our best.
The only thing I find mildly "interesting" thing is how the interviewer plays with semantics and abuses epistemology ignorance to make things look in a way that fits his agenda. The one thing that worries me is that someone with a science related major finds this interesting and valid, ignoring things he learned (or should've learned, I hope).
I also love how you just leave the link there without stating your actual opinion because you know that it will get dissected and criticized if there are any flaws (which, by your post history I know there will be) and you don't want an already weak "argument" (or whatever that video is supposed to be) to look worse when you justify it.
Also, wtp is that site?