Creation VS Evolution

but found the "science" supporting Creationism very lacking.

That's the thing....it's quite improbable, that anyone will be able to find scientific evidence at an academic level on par with current criteria for conclusiveness that would adequately support creationism at our current level of knowledge, if we understood the exact science of creation we would (or at least try on that scale) reproduce it, but lack of understanding does not mean it does not exist. As my friend once mentioned, you can only talk about life in relation to your base knowledge, if what we are talking about is beyond our base knowledge then it's quite pointless to be trying to prove or disprove it, think about the example in history of when we thought the earth was flat, until we had the necessary knowledge,equipment and understanding to conclude definitively that yes the earth is round and not flat, people were killed, cursed, shamed and exiled for suggesting the former.

Which is why i find people who completely disregard the options out there simply because of lack of evidence to be quite narrow minded given the history of earth and how humans have always held a stance until proven wrong when new tech was able to show further insight than before.

In short we simply lack the resources at this point to conclude such a topic, or even be fair in discussion because yes we may have all we need to "prove" evolution to most people's satisfaction, but we do not have the necessary resources to prove creationism or better put as the scientific evidence of God, which is what is really needed to prove creationism. I would even go as far to say that quite simply if God could be defined by science.....He wouldn't really be much of a God now would he.