Creation VS Evolution

Well I finally got a chance to watch the debate in it's entirety. I think both sides brought up some interesting points, but found the "science" supporting Creationism very lacking. I'll grant there are some inconsistencies in science methods, but that hardly discredits all the evidence. I also think Ham's insistence on differentiating the types of science was cumbersome and served to only confuse the discussion.

I've watched every debate between Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins, Bill nye and Neil Degrasse, for discussions like this, religions typically devolve into this semantics battle. What I do find interesting is the diving into philosophy because you start to realize a lot of our "social protocols" which stem from religion are still very much ingrained in us.

The point that most resonated with me was the point that non-creationist scientists do indeed make assumptions and then use them to discredit creationist scientists. I think that people who believe in the literal word of the Bible are discriminated against and ridiculed for their beliefs unjustly.

Yes this annoyed me too, which leads to the point that he lied about nothing changing his mind about his perspective, I can tell you right now what exactly would change his mind, a time machine. The fact his entire arguments foundation is "If I didn't see it first hand, you can't prove it" was so obnoxiously ridiculous he lost support on both sides of the table to be honest. A lot of people say bill nye was to hard on him, but that was probably the most calm and collected I've seen him in circumstances like this, that debate was really just like the super bowl this year, just a slam.