2014-02-05, 01:32 PM
Malthe Wrote:The difference is that the way your post was written it came off as though this debate in itself was pointless and they should just agree to disagree and stop the debate.
Sapta pointed out that the purpose isn't for the two debaters to persuade eachother but to persuade the undecided or people who aren't completely certain what they think is the truth.
And to me, such debates most definitely have value and are worth having.
If I thought the debate was pointless, why would I say that it's interesting?