2014-02-02, 07:47 AM
I think you're all over reacting f'aggots. Seriously, causing a butt hurt argument in this shadow of a fourm subsection? For shame.
You all need to chill the hell out.
I for one, appreciate the new diversity of members in the forum. Yes, it all will take getting used to, but overreacting to something like this is pretty pitiful in this subforum of all places. And to be honest, some of the rules are too damn harsh, but what can you do. You can't argue with the guy who put them there. So we just gotta deal with it. But if were not at least allowed to show cleavage, men should be fully clothed at all time, and no obscene men at all. Hell I want every man in mittens or else I'll feel highly offended.
./s of course, but if you can have a shirtless male, you can have a damn woman showing cleavage. Nothing different in a womans and a mans chest other than the fact that one has large sacks fat on their respective chest.
You all need to chill the hell out.

I for one, appreciate the new diversity of members in the forum. Yes, it all will take getting used to, but overreacting to something like this is pretty pitiful in this subforum of all places. And to be honest, some of the rules are too damn harsh, but what can you do. You can't argue with the guy who put them there. So we just gotta deal with it. But if were not at least allowed to show cleavage, men should be fully clothed at all time, and no obscene men at all. Hell I want every man in mittens or else I'll feel highly offended.
./s of course, but if you can have a shirtless male, you can have a damn woman showing cleavage. Nothing different in a womans and a mans chest other than the fact that one has large sacks fat on their respective chest.

