2014-02-02, 12:52 AM
KhainiWest Wrote:You're all rotten apples from the same forum, thus I assume the tree you came from is diseased.
Actually that was your friend who stated that you all were planning on getting banned. I'm not sure if you know what some of these 7th grade vocabulary words actually mean, since I didn't threaten. I can't threaten you with something I have no control over. I said you should be glad to not be banned in the first place, since your friend alluded that was your intention.
Google would probably take away all funding away from the website based on that title, that's how strict they are. What was followed after was an entirely different animal. I am speaking as if you are in a group because that's how you're acting.
Oh, so you're going to throw a temper tantrum then when people say you're acting unreasonable, downright barbaric it's "I don't care what you think!", jesus christ you're the epitome of the teenage trope. You want to join a community, where the mod's are pretty much the community as well. They f`uck around with us too, so when you go in saying the mods are douchebags, you're essentially calling us douchebags. They even tried to take the time to explain it to you after warning you and all they get is some childish petty reaction.
I mean you do realize that a warning has no impact on you whats so ever right? That's their job, they try to teach you without having to punish you to understand how the forum social protocol works, and you're offended because I guess you feel embarrassed?
Ironic coming from you, princess..
So apparently blatantly flaming someone is how your "lawyer smackdown" thing goes, huh.
Actually, my friends just wanted to post and bring a little livelyhood to the forum, by sharing things that they enjoy. Oh, and you very did so threaten me. You presented that I wasn't worth your "lawyer super smackdown" or whatever trademark thing that is. You baited me to respond to your post so you can then use your "lawyer smackdown" upon me. Baited would've been a better word, but both work in the end result.
No, you didn't say "unreasonable", you downright said "you don't live up to my standards". Different things. Were my friends being unreasonable when they overreacted to their thread being closed? Yeah. Was their men thread unreasonable? No, not really save the shirtless posts. Which were deleted, and they refrained from posting naked men again. However, the men thread didn't live up to standards of the users of this forum. Please quote where I had said the mods were douchebags, too, please. I don't recall ever insulting a mod outright. Rather, I questioned their judgement. Also different things. In fact, the mods have been way more reasonable than anyone else has so far. An example being you, who continues to outright flame me continuously.
Also, I said I don't exactly care for your supposed "lawyer smackdown"(™
. I never made a claim that I would also do something without any actual reasoning other than a quick generalization, then when presented with an argument, said " i don't care lol ". Not the same.You honestly lost any credibility for your argument once you started going for personal attacks, such as your first sentence or calling me a "teenage trope". I'm going to take the advice given to me from another user that frequents this site(whom of which I will not name for respect reasons) and stop responding to you.
Also, why do posts on this site get warnings/infractions but remain there? Isn't the point to remove the harmful or rule breaking posts and punish the user for doing so? I don't see the point of punishing if the thing just stays there anyway unchanged anyway...
![[Image: 0af8DbQ.gif]](http://i.imgur.com/0af8DbQ.gif)

