Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The 164 Staves.
#19
Chompy Wrote:It is still cheaper and stronger to be lukless and gives more MP total.
Not to say that LUK is bad...
If it is planned per say for a 103 elemental staff- it would be great and cheaper than a 130/70 elemental wand build.

Maybe. But I'm still holding out for uber luk weapons to come out. Then all the luklesses will be like 'crap.'

Besides, I don't care about damage. As I've said on many occasions before, I'm an idealist. All my characters must be able to equip the highest level equip with a zhelm/pendant.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The 164 Staves. - by mEanEst - 2009-01-05, 11:29 PM
The 164 Staves. - by Deviant - 2009-01-05, 11:32 PM
The 164 Staves. - by randompeep - 2009-01-05, 11:36 PM
The 164 Staves. - by Cyanne - 2009-01-05, 11:44 PM
The 164 Staves. - by Shidoshi - 2009-01-05, 11:57 PM
The 164 Staves. - by Stereo - 2009-01-06, 12:10 AM
The 164 Staves. - by Kabanaw - 2009-01-06, 12:11 AM
The 164 Staves. - by Shidoshi - 2009-01-06, 12:12 AM
The 164 Staves. - by Russt - 2009-01-06, 12:13 AM
The 164 Staves. - by Hazzy - 2009-01-06, 12:14 AM
The 164 Staves. - by Kabanaw - 2009-01-06, 12:20 AM
The 164 Staves. - by Goals - 2009-01-06, 01:47 AM
The 164 Staves. - by Derimed - 2009-01-06, 03:13 AM
The 164 Staves. - by Kabanaw - 2009-01-06, 08:24 AM
The 164 Staves. - by Stereo - 2009-01-06, 09:34 AM
The 164 Staves. - by Atruya - 2009-01-06, 01:01 PM
The 164 Staves. - by Kabanaw - 2009-01-06, 03:50 PM
The 164 Staves. - by Chompy - 2009-01-06, 05:27 PM
The 164 Staves. - by Kabanaw - 2009-01-06, 06:14 PM
The 164 Staves. - by Mickey - 2009-01-15, 10:26 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)