2013-08-05, 12:43 AM
Tim군 Wrote:I fail to see how I'm being ignorant. I'm the one who posted screenshots of the in game UI and you called it an in game event. And I'm the one being ignorant?
What better way to show how the pdr formula works than by showing the UI which shows EXACTLY how much pdr an item adds. I and countless others have provided evidence to show that the new formula is multiplicative but you have not shown ONE piece of evidence that shows otherwise. So who's the one being ignorant?
Oh and by the way, using big words and repeating the word "ignorant" doesn't make you look smart. It just makes you look like an uneducated twat.
- Oh, you do not see the UI IN THE GAME? Ignorance at it's finest. Please tell me how you see the USER INTERFACE without being IN THE GAME. I suggest that you acquire some common sense as this is pathetic.
- The UI showing exactly how much pdr some item adds in KMS, I repeat KMS, proves nothing about the formula that GMS uses in their code for multiple reasons. One is that KMS is not GMS. Yet another reason is that screenshot of your in game event, yes interacting with the USER INTERFACE is done IN THE GAME, shows nothing about how they implement their formula for PDR in their code.
- Provided evidence? You've provided no evidence at all. Countless of you individuals have provided baseless claims without proving that Nexon actually uses such formulas in their code.
- The ones who are ignorant are obviously the lot of you, as you have no choice but to guess at what formula Nexon is actually using in their code.
- Moreover, you're the one making the baseless claims without proof. As such, I have no need to provide anything that says otherwise.
- If you believe that these simple words I am using are "big", I suggest that you return to grade school and retake all of the classes that you have evidently failed, on your search to comprehend basic vocabulary.
- Try again, or not.
WRiPSTER Wrote:Oooh.... Poor choice of words...
So if I go to the border, and they check my passport, and its VALID, that's an opinion? Wow. Thanks for the education there.
- It's a fact that validity is subjective and hence, an opinion. So to answer your question, yes.
- You're also very welcome for this piece of education.
Star909 Wrote:I still see no evidence from your part who I assume knows some coding compared to someone who knows no coding at all.
So I'm guessing you also do not know. I don't see why we continue a pointless conversation based on someone who doesn't even try to make any assumption on how the formulas work other than "it's in Nexon's game coding", or should I say "a baseless claim". Also suddenly I am illogical because you have no proof on how the current formula works yet other users have at least attempted to show how the formula works. Ok thanks. It's the internet who cares about grammar, if I was in an English class I would accept that however I don't see how this makes me anymore illogical. Validity is subjective? I do not understand this.
I think I'm done here, don't want to put up with anymore of your asinine tomfoolery of calling people ignorant of at least trying to figure out a forumla or on people whom you do not know. If you would like to quote me on this, that's fine but your really more or less just talking to a wall now, and would be ignorant to even continue with me.
- Dear illogical child, I don't require any evidence as I've yet to make any claim about the formula. Common sense.
- Why would I sit here and play the guessing game with you children, when you are evidently unable to prove that your inane claims are true?
- "Suddenly illogical"? Dear child, it's quite evident that you've been illogical for quite some time.
- I'll iterate this again: I don't need any proof about how the current formula works as I've made no claim about it. Yes, other users have made baseless claims and conjecture about how the new formula works without any proof to show that their conjecture is fact. How cute.
- Yes, validity is subjective, dear child. Oh you don't understand this? Well, that's not my problem.
Quote:who doesn't even try to make any assumption on how the formulas work other than "it's in Nexon's game coding", or should I say "a baseless claim".
- Ignorance at it's finest. It's a fact that any formula that Nexon uses for their game is in the code for the game, as games are made with, wait for it ---, code. I suggest that you do a quick google search and actually find out how video games work. Here's a hint, they aren't made by boiling ingredients in hot cauldrons at Hogwarts, whilst under the watchful eye of Professor Snape.
- Formula*, among other things. You're*.
- The only ones here who are asinine are the lot of you who make baseless claims without any proof.
- Try again.
Derosis Wrote:Oh the ironing. Should take a little bit of your own medicine and read your own shit and proofread.
- Irony*. Yes, the irony is indeed strong with this one.
- The one who needs to proofread is definitely you, dear child. Oh and profanity? How cute. And you have the audacity to call other people's posts "ironing". How utterly hilarious and hypocritical.
- Try again.