2013-08-04, 10:23 PM
thejman250 Wrote:- Ignorance at it's finest.
- You've yet to prove that the formula that Nexon uses in their code is multiplicative as you are claiming. I'm waiting for you to actually prove that your claim is true however, I highly doubt that you'll be able to do so.
- You haven't presented anything to "prove wrong" as you have nothing aside from baseless claims and conjecture.
- Moreover, I've never claimed anything about the formula.
- How about you actually read my post properly, if you do actually posses the ability to read.
- Try again.
- Validity is subjective and hence, an opinion.
- My "arguments"? I posted the fact that you need the code to prove what actually exists in the code.
- Exposed utterly illogical child.
- Using the fallacy of ignorance are you? I'm sorry, dear illogical child however, the fallacious drivel that you have just spouted is false. I suggest that you return to grade school to develop a basic understanding of common sense and simple logic as you evidently, don't even have that. The lack of anyone else providing a conjecture does not make the conjecture that you foolishly pulled out of your rear end true. Again, that is disgustingly fallacious and utterly illogical drivel at it's finest.
- Until you actually have proof, your conjectures and baseless claims, will remain just that. Baseless claims.
- I "lose"? How utterly hilarious. The only one who "loses" anything is you all, because you have no proof that PDR is multiplicative. It's sad, isn't it? That all of your drivel is nothing more than mere conjecture.
- Oh, and that's "you're"*. Evidence*.
- Try again, you poor illogical child.
I still see no evidence from your part who I assume knows some coding compared to someone who knows no coding at all.
So I'm guessing you also do not know. I don't see why we continue a pointless conversation based on someone who doesn't even try to make any assumption on how the formulas work other than "it's in Nexon's game coding", or should I say "a baseless claim". Also suddenly I am illogical because you have no proof on how the current formula works yet other users have at least attempted to show how the formula works. Ok thanks. It's the internet who cares about grammar, if I was in an English class I would accept that however I don't see how this makes me anymore illogical. Validity is subjective? I do not understand this.
I think I'm done here, don't want to put up with anymore of your asinine tomfoolery of calling people ignorant of at least trying to figure out a forumla or on people whom you do not know. If you would like to quote me on this, that's fine but your really more or less just talking to a wall now, and would be ignorant to even continue with me.