2013-08-04, 09:13 PM
Tim군 Wrote:>In game event
Are you serious right now. It's the game UI, not an in game EVENT
- Ignorance at it's finest.
- You've yet to prove that the formula that Nexon uses in their code is multiplicative as you are claiming. I'm waiting for you to actually prove that your claim is true however, I highly doubt that you'll be able to do so.
Dark Link Wrote:Since you're so bent on "proving" us wrong, why don't you provide proof that the formula is still additive? Apparently all the evidence in the world isn't enough for you, so now it's your turn to prove the world wrong.
- You haven't presented anything to "prove wrong" as you have nothing aside from baseless claims and conjecture.
- Moreover, I've never claimed anything about the formula.
- How about you actually read my post properly, if you do actually posses the ability to read.
- Try again.
Star909 Wrote:I'd like to see you show the coding for Nexon's current PDR formula, otherwise your arguments are invalid as well as your statements. Until you reveal said formula, then the several user's math formula's which conveniently fit the damage reduction taken is conveniently true. And if you choose to ignore me or say that you don't have the time/you absolutely don't care/your just being a troll, then we can render that your statements are yet again invalid and we can move on with our forums. If you chose to reply to me without proper showing of said code, then again your arguments are invalid and you're being no more than a troll. But then again your most likely going to say "Why do I have to listen to someone one the internet?" in which it simply either means A: you're too lazy to show evidece/look into it for yourself B: you can not look into the coding therefore you do not know yourself C: you really do know/don't know but you want to bother us.
Either way you still lose.
Oh and next your going to say "Why don't I show what's in the coding?", my reply would be, "Why do I have to listen to someone else on the internet?". Plus this is my challenge to you, if you back down from the challenge go right ahead.
- Validity is subjective and hence, an opinion.
- My "arguments"? I posted the fact that you need the code to prove what actually exists in the code.
Quote:Until you reveal said formula, then the several user's math formula's which conveniently fit the damage reduction taken is conveniently true.
- Exposed utterly illogical child.
- Using the fallacy of ignorance are you? I'm sorry, dear illogical child however, the fallacious drivel that you have just spouted is false. I suggest that you return to grade school to develop a basic understanding of common sense and simple logic as you evidently, don't even have that. The lack of anyone else providing a conjecture does not make the conjecture that you foolishly pulled out of your rear end true. Again, that is disgustingly fallacious and utterly illogical drivel at it's finest.
- Until you actually have proof, your conjectures and baseless claims, will remain just that. Baseless claims.
- I "lose"? How utterly hilarious. The only one who "loses" anything is you all, because you have no proof that PDR is multiplicative. It's sad, isn't it? That all of your drivel is nothing more than mere conjecture.
- Oh, and that's "you're"*. Evidence*.
- Try again, you poor illogical child.