Prism

And thus, with age comes a desire from privacy. It's not necessarily age in and of itself, it's with age comes events and happenings that you want to (for whatever reason) keep to yourself. However even still that is incorrect because even today the notion of privacy is completely different. Social media directly contradicts conventional privacy, unless your Facebook friends are only the friends you want seeing things. Time magazine for example talked about how the current generation is more into sharing, citing the number of pictures of oneself they had as an example. A status update or a tweet contradicts privacy because the vast majority of people use it for sharing things that wouldn't be shared otherwise.

I love how you just elaborate on my point. You're not actually making any argument and just ignoring the basis that it isn't just internet/social media. You have brought no contradiction to the table so there's no point actually discussing this further.

Saying bomb to a TSA agent or just loudly in an airport is akin to yelling fire in a crowded movie theater; the clear and present danger standard for limiting freedom of speech in America. And again by itself, the Jihadist war cry is nothing because people make it all the time. Not to mention you can find it all over YouTube anyways.

You just cannot fathom that you as an american citizen can be held for literally doing anything under that patriot act. You just want to argue specific examples, not the underlining point. Again, nothing else to discuss.

Let me help you then: the internet was not around in the 60s. Give me language that says you have the right to privacy on the internet. I'll concede that email should be private and probably Skype/IMs. Can you find anything that says anything else should be private? Now, if the Supreme Court had made a ruling on whether or not there is privacy on the internet (regrettably they declined one that could have *tear*) then this would be different.

It doesn't matter if it's specific to the internet or not, in fact it be more specific towards cloud computing. When you consider the internet in any type of law you treat it like something easily comparable too. The things that should remain private, such as your personal finances which are quickly becoming part of the cloud, by extension are covered by the 4th. It's creepy having all your sh`it recorded, this conversation we're having right now, could be recorded.

If she is discriminated upon the basis of having many abortions, then it is unacceptable. If the number of abortions is made completely public, say in a newspaper or any other readily and easily accessible medium, then it is unacceptable. If there is public ridicule or shaming, to contrast from a few workers at a company laughing at her in private, then it is unacceptable. Otherwise I don't care, even if it's me.

What the f`uck do you think the paparazzi do on a daily basis? In fact they are one step from stalking, and have killed a few people with their constant coverage of their everyday life. Last but not least, the Patriot act pretty much abolish's any type of need for a warrant.

Also considering your response to locations, pretty sure that is military brat circumstances. You live in Virginia which has many military basis/high military retirement population. I could list all the places I have been, but I certainly don't consider them adventures, just living life where I was told to live.