KhainiWest Wrote:I'd give you more credit if you actually watched the video or seen people trying to respond to her, intellectually mind you, only to be berated by feminist nazi's.This makes no sense because you're assuming I've not watched something; you're not my eyes and ears, and you're not in my head. As a result, you don't know what I have and haven't watched. This is a bad assumption on your part.
Quote:The point of putting up these video's were clearly for discussion, she says so in her own goddamn video's, yet silences any communication based on the threat of being harassed. If she want's discussion, she should allow discussion, not cry like a little b`itch over "tits or get the pineapple out". It's melodramatic, and ironic as f`uck to be honest. If she feels confident enough to project her idea's, then she should have confidence to see the feedback, which she has torn away.Your definition of "starting a discussion" is different from mine, then. There are more ways to start a discussion than YouTube comments, which is clearly obvious because the legitimate comments get overwhelmed by those that should never be seen (or said). You can discuss things elsewhere and utilise the video as a starting point.
Quote:It's entirely retarded to try to have a discussion with her because if isn't positive reinforcement, it's disregarded, wasted effort.What's a wasted effort is to call you out on your use of 'retarded.' If you can't vent your frustrations somewhere that's off of YouTube, you have a problem. It's your right to make baseless assumptions on a video; if you can't figure out how to talk about it elsewhere, you need to re-evaluate yourself. I've given you alternatives to the blackhole that is YouTube commenting, but you're willingly ignoring it.
Quote:So based on her reaction of the comments as victimizing herself, I can judge her character, which is, delicate, much like the female characters she criticizes. Seriously, if I was in her position, I would have left all communication open, I want to see how the general public reflects on my opinion. If youtube is really that useless she shouldn't have reflected her "educated" opinion there.But you'll never be in her position, which is the problem. It's quite clear to me that you're not capable of putting yourself in someone else's situation. After this, I have no further reason to respond to anything else. Based on your presentation, I can assume that you need to learn skills regarding empathy.
Quote:By the way, I know you're from a different country, but for the life of me, the dictionary, in all languages from pomegranatety half assed translations, does not refer to rape as a gender specific action. If it is, it's moronic as men, although unlikely, can be forced too.I'm from the United States, smart one. I live in Australia. I never said rape only occurs to women, I said it was violence against women (when used against women, so maybe I should've clarified that further so you couldn't try to use it against me). Thanks for nitpicking while not having your facts straight, though.
But, if you read legislation history, it wasn't until recently that laws included men in rape cases. According to law, men could not be raped. As a result, rape was typically defined (particularly among society but definitely in law) as only occurring to women. So perhaps you might want to do some research of your own regarding the history of legislation against rape before you try to unnecessarily correct me regarding something I didn't really say.