2013-05-30, 07:59 PM
nikki Wrote:6. @KhainiWest; Regarding turning off comments, ratings/statistics, and Instead we have hundreds of response video's of which case she ignores, along with any form of communication.
Its not weak to put something online and have your face associated with it. We know who she is and what her name is; we know quite a lot of information about her. Its not weak because you have other methods of contacting her (blog posts, written articles, Tumblr, Twitter and her website, for example) if you want to submit your feedback to her. It would be weak if she posted it anonymously, with no telling signs of who she is. And since she was spam-flagged, ratings are pointless; the same exact thing would happen. Also, unless your place of residence is inside of Anitas head, you cannot talk about what she does and does not ignore because you have absolutely no clue what she reads or watches outside of the presented material. Even if she doesnt mention it or respond to it (because a lot of it is goading her), she may see it and take into consideration the thoughts presented. It's a logical fallacy to assume information one cannot possibly have.
And because I think people need more of a view of the actual treatment of women in the gaming industry, GBITKs Isolated Incidents is just the tip of the iceberg. They need to finish compiling, but its insanity to read. I can't remember if I linked it last time, so there it is.
I'd give you more credit if you actually watched the video or seen people trying to respond to her, intellectually mind you, only to be berated by feminist nazi's. Although, she's on the border of being one during those initial twitter comments. The point of putting up these video's were clearly for discussion, she says so in her own goddamn video's, yet silences any communication based on the threat of being harassed. If she want's discussion, she should allow discussion, not cry like a little b`itch over "tits or get the pineapple out". It's melodramatic, and ironic as f`uck to be honest. If she feels confident enough to project her idea's, then she should have confidence to see the feedback, which she has torn away.
It's entirely retarded to try to have a discussion with her because if isn't positive reinforcement, it's disregarded, wasted effort. Now we just have an army of haters who are more passionate about spiting her than discussing with her because they can't vent their frustrations. And you're absolutely right, they already have all the information they possibly could get on this girl. So to say this is a "safe" measure of protection is idiotic. She's scared to see the true opinion of her work, which is not 150 thousand dollars+ worth of research, let alone a convincing piece.
So based on her reaction of the comments as victimizing herself, I can judge her character, which is, delicate, much like the female characters she criticizes. Seriously, if I was in her position, I would have left all communication open, I want to see how the general public reflects on my opinion. If youtube is really that useless she shouldn't have reflected her "educated" opinion there.
By the way, I know you're from a different country, but for the life of me, the dictionary, in all languages from shitty half assed translations, does not refer to rape as a gender specific action. If it is, it's moronic as men, although unlikely, can be forced too.