2013-05-29, 03:14 PM
I don't understand why we're debating about Sarkeesian over the points she's making. Come on guys.
Her points fail because the points are intrinsically flawed. Disintegrating a point of view based on the personality or the nature of the speaker is an ad hom. I do believe that she's a very blatant thief, but that is only true because I don't believe that her opinions or analysis merits anything close to the value that other initiatives the money could have gone into in order to benefit the public.
Khaini Wrote:... if she doesn't allow her opinion to be discussed or challenged, directly to her, then it's invalid. Especially if she doesn't allow people to even VOTE on her video. She just assumes everyone is out to get her, thus anyone who challenges her opinion is just a hater. Hence the comparison with amy baking company, or did you miss that too?
Her points fail because the points are intrinsically flawed. Disintegrating a point of view based on the personality or the nature of the speaker is an ad hom. I do believe that she's a very blatant thief, but that is only true because I don't believe that her opinions or analysis merits anything close to the value that other initiatives the money could have gone into in order to benefit the public.