2013-05-29, 02:12 PM
KillerZero Wrote:actually, you do give a crap, because us asking to have blunt weapon charges is somehow bothering you?(meaning, you do give a crap about it, just deep down). If it doesn't bother you, and majority of paladins don't care about blunt weapons, then you should have no problem with having optional blunt weapon charges. We are not asking them to soley make blunt weapon charges, we are asking to have the option if you are using a blunt weapon. Yes, blast needs to go back to a 1 on 1. Its not even used as an attack anymore. Its more like, hey if i use this attack while having 5 charges, EVEN if i attack nothing, ill gain buffs. Thats what blast has been reduced to, a slow buff attack. Are we looking at the same skill? I see a black and white marshmellow getting ready in for a pounding. It doesn't fit with the current maple style at all, but that is a matter of preference.
You need to read better. He was acting like he was speaking for all paladins with his list when he only speaking for a very small minority when most in the game don't like or care about them. Did you even see the part where i said "granted it don't make sense to have sword animation if your using a mace." That means they should add them eventually for completeness sake but If they added them or not wouldn't matter to most because most all use swords anyway so its not a priority whatsoever over more important things that paladins need and Nexon agrees.