2013-03-05, 03:46 PM
Pixaro Wrote:wow that is the most messed up story i read in a while.
so the woman that carried the baby refused to abort even though there is 50% that the child would not live a normal life(article) and then after she successfully gave birth to her she is giving that baby to another family to adopt it? i mean really? you fought all this time to keep her alive and then you let someone else raise it and carry that burden of (possibly) a disabled child with heart problems,brain problems and a cleft lip? thats is, in my opinion PURE evil, even though she is religious NO ONE should suffer living like that, and yes doesnt matter how you look at it both the adoptive family and the child will suffer because of that selfish religious woman who couldnt give up her opinion for greater good.
The adoptive family knew what they were getting into. They volunteered to take this baby, knowing all her problems. Saints? Masochists? Who knows? But I don't count them with the people suffering from this decision.
[MENTION=5228]Razmos[/MENTION]; Of course the article is biased in her direction. It's based on her side of things. Everyone else was "unavailable for comment".
[MENTION=4235]KhainiWest[/MENTION]; and [MENTION=10378]Curtiss[/MENTION]; I too find the "moment of weakness" and her immediately regretting it story a bit sickening. Good thing the parents refused this counteroffer, so we can't know whether she really meant it (as blackmail, as their attorney suggested) or not.