2013-02-15, 01:19 AM
Fiel Wrote:...says every single person who wants to invade my privacy.
Do you have even the smallest delusion of privacy in an online game today? If so, please tell me how? Every one knows damn well an invisible GM could be lurking on any map, listening on any channel, that anything they do or say can end up resulting in a ban.
As for the rest of your claim;
Fiel Wrote:In the current system, you are presumed innocent and they have to prove you guilty just like any sane court system should be.
Absolute drivel. You're presumed guilty because Nexon said so. There is no presumption of innocence at all. If they say it, It Is. There is no trial, there is no representation, there is no peer review, there is absolutely nothing comparable to a court system here.
In order for Presumption of Innocence to exist there would have to at least be a system like I described where proof is brought forth against the accused, otherwise it's presumption of guilt and expecting the player to whip out miracle evidence proving their innocence like Zelkova managed.
I disregard the account theft premise entirely. It's possible, but if someone steals your car and commits a hit and run fatality with it you're never going to see that car again because it's evidence. You can't prove you didn't share the account, you can't prove it wasn't you from somewhere else, all that can be proven is that someone was on the account and committed a crime, and they'd at least have evidence of that so you couldn't say it didn't happen. If they chose to be lenient on it that's demonstrated mercy, but if they didn't it's equally legitimate if painful, but no more so than if the hacker had outright deleted your stuff anyway. Comes out the same.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.