False bannings galore.

Not when Hime has anything to say about it

Claims like that are a bit absurd considering they refuse to share their so called evidence with the person they're accusing 99% of the time.

The privacy pretense is just an excuse for them to dodge accountability for their actions under the guise of 'for your own good'. If someone's broken the ToS they deserve no protection from the evidence of that fact and it's in everyone's best interest that proof be publicly available so no one can whine and moan about how innocent they are with no evidence either way. He said/she said is crap for customer service. The simple fact they have posted proof publicly before demonstrates that they can disregard any policy about privacy on a whim.