2013-02-11, 04:19 PM
Chilly Wrote:If I chose slowing down time, I suspect that within real world 20 years, I'd be 60-70 years old and dead within 40 years due to abuse of the skill . I would live a "shorter" life and not be able to experience nearly all the things I would like to in one lifetime. Therefore, I must choose speeding up time because I would live "longer", perhaps long enough to live into a time where anti-aging technologies have progressed far enough to prolong this life even more. Not to mention, if I ever lived into a time where the backwards timemachine were invented everything would be gravy.You did read the original post right?
Don't be fooled by the short-term advantages of slowing time.
Quote:One rule though: your metabolism and aging stays in normal speed regardless of if you're slowing time or speeding it up. (speed up time 3x for 1 hour, you age 1 hour. Slow down time to .5 or even .1x for 1 hour, still age 1 hour.)