2013-02-04, 09:16 AM
SaptaZapta Wrote:I find the discussion about who has more legal expertise rather ridiculous.
The line of defense I posted is not my idea. It's what the hospital's defense attorney came up with. TYT quoted it directly.
One would assume that the defense attorney in the case would know more, both about the law in his state and about the details of the case, than anyone here. Unless, of course, the hospital skimps on its legal expenses, and hired an idiot who's going to be laughed out of court.
Who even questioned this?
If you followed the conversation I questioned his competency considering the information he was spouting was dead on wrong. He erroneously questioned "legal" experience, which I don't have a problem clarifying, though irrelevant. Note I will question the credibility when such details and straight up lying is in his retorts.
[MENTION=5956]hadriel[/MENTION];
Exactly, consent is everything in that proffesion, which is why it's to me, ridiculous they would deny it, there was no negative consequence for attempting to do so.