Catholic Hospital Says Fetus Isn't Human Life

Never said that it wasn't hypocritical, tacky, etc. I just said it was legally sound. Good work putting words into my mouth, maybe one day I'll do it to you.

Fetus is not a person. Therefore, cannot be manslaughter. Did a little more research, Colorado considers life to begin at birth.

Completely ignore my relevant point. Okay.

And your experience....? I mean, you're no more (if not less) experienced than I am. Unless you count e-justice, I guess you'd probably be an expert on that.

Although my job does not deal specifically with criminal justice, I do in fact have to talk with lawyers on a daily basis concerning tax law. It's the same jargon pretty much. Foot in your mouth twice now.

Not sure where you're going with this but immediately after the definition of an illegal abortion, which you gave, it gives the definition of a legal abortion.

Death of mother, the abortion would have been legal. How interesting.


Will do. Perhaps if you respond with something of substance I'll be coerced into responding, but I doubt it.

I'm sorry, would you care to point where you read that? I feel like you're trying make up statements to benefit your argument.

Intentional ending of pregnancy by licensed physician using accepted medical procedures and as required, with appropriate consent. Continuation of pregnancy likely to result in death or permanent physical or mental impairment of mother, or child born with grave mental or physical retardation, or within first 16 weeks of pregnancy and pregnancy result of sexual assault or incest. Court declared unconstitutional, but not repealed

With basic sentence comprehension you can see the following bolded points.

It's legal to do an abortion at any time if the pregnancy is killing the mother. This is not the case, the mother was suffering heart failure and they refused to attempt to save the children. Although I will correct myself and mistakenly put manslaughter when I meant to put malpractice. Again, if you watched the video or actually looked for the article you would see they are in fact suing for malpractice, which would have been a legitimate correction you could have used.

Tut tut.