2013-01-30, 11:28 AM
hadriel Wrote:IMO a reasonable man would be willing to save another if it is within one's abilities and does not put one in harm's way (directly, that is). I'm starting to wonder if these doctors are being reasonable or not... They define a fetus that is delivered as a baby and therefore a living person, while if it's still inside the mother and it dies (e.g. miscarriage/delivery failure) then they're not liable to homicide because it's not delivered and therefore not a living person?
Are there states that do not allow abortion because the state law dictates that a fetus is a living person? (I know this is going abit off, but this is related to what Sapta said...)
This is... strange. To me.
Hadriel
Yes, but I'm under the assumption this was a late time during pregnancy and their refusal is odd which is the bottom line. If someones dying there's no harm trying to get the babies out as a possibility, now they are trying to fall back on the very law they try to change.
