2013-01-27, 03:35 PM
Curtiss Wrote:You know what's invalid? Taking something that happened in the past and using it as an argument that a revamp geared towards one class that has that class's name should instead feature its job instructor who is most likely of maxed level in the first place, while also ignoring the possibility that they did it because said job instructor might one day be an actual class and lord forbid there be two official artworks of the same guy for completely different classes.
Du, what? I almost lost track of this.

