2013-01-09, 08:46 AM
Words Wrote:How was I supposed to know that he was a townie?
If you're mafia, that's an easy question to answer.
Besides, it was safer to vote for Maping than to let Corn get lynched.
Agreed. It still puts you in the most likely group to have at least 1 mafian, though.
My vote was more than enough to prevent Corn's lynch, blame the ones who kept on voting for him, not me.
Every vote has equal weight with exception, rarely, to a tiebreaker vote or to a Mayor role.
Or blame the ones that kept their Corn votes.
Everyone pointing out how the last game went made me doubt Corn, I wasn't role fishing.
I said explicitly in my first post that meta should be disregarded. 1 game does not a metagame make, and basing decisions off of a single game is a bad idea.
For Afeared it was this:
How is that not fishy? Especially after he posts his reasons for suspecting Maping, but not for Zelkova. I just wanted to know what made him suspicious of Zelkova, if he suspected something and it was reasonable it might've been better and maybe we wouldn't have lynched Maping. It was just day 1, how would he have any information?
Afeared's comment was suspicious. The specific way you demanded an answer is also suspicious. I noted that I am skeptical of him, but that there is more cause to suspect you right now than him.
Afeared even insinuated that Corn was mafia even after his claim.
At this point the claim was early, so a counterclaim was/is still possible. Especially when the claim only came when Corn was being pushed into a corner. I wasn't sure of Corn at the time, either.
Polantaris also defended Zelkova. Why aren't you suspicious of him? He also never changed his Corn vote, and he posted after Corn's claim.
I am "skeptical" of Polantaris. I'm still not entirely sure what I think, though, and there are too many people that stand out a lot for me to be too worried about him at this time.
I'm curious about @Zelkova starting the lynch too.
[COLOR="#cc8899"]Comments in puce. You addressed the points I made, but I'm concerned that you are apparently trying to focus my attention towards people that aren't as worrisome to me. This was part of why I made that list - I wanted to see who would bandwagon those I labeled as suspect and who would attempt to divert from that list.
You interest me in that you did not attempt to deflect towards the others that I suspect more highly and instead are trying to divert attention to people that I'm not as worried about.
There's a name that you avoided mentioning entirely. Netto.
(Moved vote to bottom of post for easier reading for Host)
Derosis Wrote:Can we actually confirm @Corn; 's role as Doctor, or are we just going to assume it's a bus driver? Just because he Roleclamed X doesn't mean Y didn't happen, or he could possibly be Z. He could have easily mislead us to vote for the lynched townie in question by roleclaming an incredibly useful role.
In order to credibly believe that Corn is a Bus Driver, he would have to:
1. Know who the REAL doctor is when nobody else does
2. Have known who someone OTHER than the real doctor was going to target last night (namely, me).
That's a lot of stretching to assume Corn is a Bus Driver. Doctor hasn't been counterclaimed and I can verify that I was indeed successfully protected last night.
Unless you're implying that you targeted me last night. I was visited by more than 1 person last night, not all of them in a threatening way. I have certain clues as to who those people may be, enough that a breadcrumb or two should be able to confirm some folks as townies if they can identify themselves.
Let's see what happens if I do this.
[Vote][MENTION=3730]Netto[/MENTION];
[/COLOR]