2013-01-08, 12:09 AM
Thanks for linking the Ruth Institute at the end, because I was wondering what the pineapple these places were the whole time.
What a joke. And almost all of these studies are bound to have their limitations anyways. I read an incredible one last year for class that showed children of homosexual couples were actually more well-adjusted than those raised in heterosexual households, and I wish I could find for the life of me now, but even though it was extensive, followed families for decades, and from a highly reputable institution, it still rested on, for example, self-reporting from families, which suffers from [url=]social desirability bias[/url].
So no study is perfect, but within the scope of effective statistical measurement there are more studies finding no issue with homosexual parents than not, with enough bullshit attacks like these from jokes of organizations.
What a joke. And almost all of these studies are bound to have their limitations anyways. I read an incredible one last year for class that showed children of homosexual couples were actually more well-adjusted than those raised in heterosexual households, and I wish I could find for the life of me now, but even though it was extensive, followed families for decades, and from a highly reputable institution, it still rested on, for example, self-reporting from families, which suffers from [url=]social desirability bias[/url].
So no study is perfect, but within the scope of effective statistical measurement there are more studies finding no issue with homosexual parents than not, with enough bullshit attacks like these from jokes of organizations.