2013-01-07, 10:31 AM
MasPan Wrote:The problem with that line of thinking is that it's self-fueling. If nobody ever votes, there's no cause to suspect anyone, and thus no reason to vote against anyone...and then you're relying entirely on the detective to do all the work. It's not a good idea.
Exactly. No one gets lynched unfairly if the votes are split towards each person (In the case that they don't come back quickly enough) and getting people to talk helps people to at least find some information on the first day. The votes would be just as random on subsequent days unless people are talking, hence why random lynching to ping people works on the first day.