2012-10-26, 08:12 PM
This is pretty bizarre, and to be honest, I thought it was a complete load of bull when I was reading it.
I posted it to our alliance facebook group, and someone posted this:
So I dunno. Maybe this kind of fraud does exist in other countries, and maybe it does exist here.
I've also heard that the precincts with major discrepancies between exit poll results and actual election results use machines. But then again, that's all hearsay.
(Also, I have no idea how to go about verifying or disproving their claims, statistics is not my forte.)
I posted it to our alliance facebook group, and someone posted this:
Quote:This is actually pretty common in the elections of every country that uses machines as counters, it's very easy to use them to cheat (I know because I had to simulate one for a project in my university). Most of those machines operative systems can't be read by another one so you can't exactly know if someone changed the software, this was discussed in the Venezuelan elections too and the answer was literally "pineapple you".
In the Venezuelan elections the anomalies are almost similar 8-10% also in cities with high density populations, maybe Romney and Chavez aren't that different after all....
So I dunno. Maybe this kind of fraud does exist in other countries, and maybe it does exist here.
I've also heard that the precincts with major discrepancies between exit poll results and actual election results use machines. But then again, that's all hearsay.
(Also, I have no idea how to go about verifying or disproving their claims, statistics is not my forte.)