2008-12-05, 12:18 AM
TomasLuther Wrote:The list was originally made to see who has the better equips and that's all, level shouldn't take any part no matter how hard you trained, if you wanna see a list based on how hard someone trained, they can do that in Nexon's site.
But i'd like to suggest a change in the "base lvl" used in the list. I know lvl 150 was chosen because it was a more realistic lvl to achieve, but i really think the lvl used for the list should be 200 since that's the higher you can get.
Using this lvl will also lower the advantages a character can get just by being a "-less" stat character, leaving the equips to be the more determinant factor to make it high in the list. Which is exactly why the list was created in the first place, to see who has the better equips no matter what lvl the character is.
Just my 2 cents, other than that, great job you are doing here Chris <333
Rankings only reflect lvl not gear or damage.
An unscaled list will take into consideration BOTH gear AND lvl. Like i said, you can be 13x with godly gear but you still don't compete damage-wise against a 18x with decent gear.
Don't you wonder why not many high lvls care to post their ranges? We put time and effort into our gear and lvls. By disregarding or lvls it just means there's no value placed on our hard work. Nexon rankings would be the opposite (reflects only lvls not damage/gear).
If you can't compete on nexon ranks, then this list is for you. But i think it would be more fair to try to compete on both playing fields at the same time. Work and effort is required for gear and lvls so why not take both into consideration?

