Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Double Uppercut: not so interesting?
#4
Russt Wrote:But what makes DU -> FF x2 -> repeat (I'll call this A) that much better than FF x4 -> repeat (I'll call this B)?

A is 1.98 seconds long and totals 1120% damage
B is 2.04 seconds long and totals 1080% damage

What's so amazing about such minute differences?

It's obvious.
40% more damage and a few seconds of stun.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Double Uppercut: not so interesting? - by Russt - 2008-12-04, 11:40 PM
Double Uppercut: not so interesting? - by Russt - 2008-12-04, 11:46 PM
Double Uppercut: not so interesting? - by InBomb - 2008-12-04, 11:52 PM
Double Uppercut: not so interesting? - by Russt - 2008-12-04, 11:54 PM
Double Uppercut: not so interesting? - by Dusk - 2008-12-05, 12:05 AM
Double Uppercut: not so interesting? - by JoeTang - 2008-12-05, 12:32 AM
Double Uppercut: not so interesting? - by Loose - 2008-12-05, 12:36 AM
Double Uppercut: not so interesting? - by InBomb - 2008-12-05, 12:54 AM
Double Uppercut: not so interesting? - by Russt - 2008-12-05, 12:58 AM
Double Uppercut: not so interesting? - by Russt - 2008-12-05, 01:27 AM
Double Uppercut: not so interesting? - by Russt - 2008-12-05, 02:19 AM
Double Uppercut: not so interesting? - by DrRusty - 2008-12-05, 05:27 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)