Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
seismologist convicted manslaughter
#4
So let me get this straight, they are being sent to jail because they didn't foresee the damage a major earthquake would have had on the city a few days before one happen to hit?

Not sure but seeing as one quake was on the 15th century and the other was on the 18th century, shouldn't said city had to prepare for the next one from some time ago? like from a few decades ago?

I really don't get why cities in seismically active areas have to wait for a strong quake before passing on laws to prevent as much damage as possible.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by VerrKol - 2012-10-22, 07:56 PM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by Luxeraph - 2012-10-22, 09:06 PM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by Shidoshi - 2012-10-22, 10:02 PM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by VerrKol - 2012-10-22, 11:23 PM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by JoeTang - 2012-10-22, 11:52 PM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by Curtiss - 2012-10-23, 07:06 AM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by Curtiss - 2012-10-23, 10:44 AM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by Curtiss - 2012-10-23, 10:58 AM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by Locked - 2012-10-23, 04:02 PM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by Locked - 2012-10-23, 04:04 PM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by JoeTang - 2012-10-23, 04:13 PM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by JoeTang - 2012-10-23, 04:35 PM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by Locked - 2012-10-23, 07:53 PM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by Curtiss - 2012-10-24, 05:55 AM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by Coogi - 2012-10-24, 09:43 PM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by Stereo - 2012-10-25, 03:35 AM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by hadriel - 2012-10-25, 02:45 PM
seismologist convicted manslaughter - by Curtiss - 2012-10-25, 03:35 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)