2012-10-18, 10:55 AM
The topic title and first line of the request for this change was even:
Not sure how "no feather at all" ever came into play.
Honestly, I originally voted for #6...but after thinking about it, I would probably have gone for #1. I was half asleep, and I realize now that the red doesn't make sense for the theme of the site.
#1 combines the feather and SP together in an interesting way, I kind of like it after looking at it longer.
#2 looks too...plain.
#3 is almost exactly the same as what we have now.
#4 is meh...I get that Extractors are a big thing in MS, but I don't see the resemblance to the site, considering I don't think I've ever once seen them mentioned here, and it's certainly not a huge thing for SP.
#5 is...hmm... I forgot that the anchor was SP's Map logo, but still...it just seems off. Maybe I'm just too used to the feather.
Quote: Create a new (or revised) logo for Southperry Contest!
Eos has requested that we have a contest to create a new, or revised, Southperry logo.
Not sure how "no feather at all" ever came into play.
Honestly, I originally voted for #6...but after thinking about it, I would probably have gone for #1. I was half asleep, and I realize now that the red doesn't make sense for the theme of the site.
#1 combines the feather and SP together in an interesting way, I kind of like it after looking at it longer.
#2 looks too...plain.
#3 is almost exactly the same as what we have now.
#4 is meh...I get that Extractors are a big thing in MS, but I don't see the resemblance to the site, considering I don't think I've ever once seen them mentioned here, and it's certainly not a huge thing for SP.
#5 is...hmm... I forgot that the anchor was SP's Map logo, but still...it just seems off. Maybe I'm just too used to the feather.

