2012-09-07, 01:58 AM
How I envy those of you whose lives are so sheltered that you can get so outraged at a haircut rule.
As for the $60 haircut: the mother should demand the hair stylist return the money.
Since the rules for boys' hair are state-wide, every person in the country who professionally cuts children's hair should be familiar with them. When the boy went in for his $60 haircut, the stylist should have cut it in accordance with the rules: not touching the ears, etc. As we can see from the pictures, it's not that big of a difference. Not like the boy had truly long hair and told the stylist "don't touch it". There's no excuse for charging money and leaving the boy's hair in a condition he wouldn't be allowed to take the state exam in.
As for the $60 haircut: the mother should demand the hair stylist return the money.
Since the rules for boys' hair are state-wide, every person in the country who professionally cuts children's hair should be familiar with them. When the boy went in for his $60 haircut, the stylist should have cut it in accordance with the rules: not touching the ears, etc. As we can see from the pictures, it's not that big of a difference. Not like the boy had truly long hair and told the stylist "don't touch it". There's no excuse for charging money and leaving the boy's hair in a condition he wouldn't be allowed to take the state exam in.