2011-06-23, 01:09 PM
It's got a 40% on rotten tomatoes- looks like Pixar has released its first critical failure.
|
Cars 2 a flop?
|
|
2011-06-23, 01:09 PM
It's got a 40% on rotten tomatoes- looks like Pixar has released its first critical failure.
2011-06-23, 01:28 PM
The first Cars wasn't even that good compared to the rest of Pixar's films. Throw in a sequel and you got a recipe for disaster.
2011-06-23, 01:32 PM
I actually really enjoyed the first one. Sure, it wasn't an "OMG this film is pure amazing!" like Toy Story or Wall-E, but still was entertaining. Doing a sequel though...I felt that both Cars and Kung Fu Panda were good movies in themselves. Adding on though...bleh. Unless I see them and am completely impressed, I'm grouping them with Shrek 3 and 4. :/
2011-06-23, 01:32 PM
It does not matter. Box officer numbers matter. They give Green lantern a 26% and it raked in 53m over Super 8 which was a better movie.
First car was good might just dl the 2nd one
2011-06-23, 01:33 PM
street Wrote:It does not matter. Box officer numbers matter. They give Green lantern a 26% and it raked in 53m over Super 8 which was a better movie. Pretty much agree with this. Opinions.
2011-06-23, 02:17 PM
They gave Avatar (Airbender) a single digit percent and it got 50 million. Gee, I wonder which one is correct.
2011-06-23, 02:41 PM
Corn Wrote:They gave Avatar (Airbender) a single digit percent and it got 50 million. Gee, I wonder which one is correct. Airbender wasn't a commercial flop. From a critic P.O.V.? Movie sucked hard.
2011-06-23, 02:51 PM
Yeah, I figure it will still make enough money to warrant cars 3. But I feel like Pixar might actually care about critical response, unlike disney.
2011-06-23, 09:59 PM
The first Cars was terrible enough that they felt they needed to remake this for some awful reason. Not wasting my money.
2011-06-24, 12:35 AM
It's really a hit with small children - the money they make on merchandising alone is totally worth the sequel.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|