I Have a Life
#21
Osama doesn't HARRISON 1 OSAMA 0

ZING.
#22
I'd post ponies, but the thread is not even worth it.
#23
Shidoshi Wrote:I'd post ponies, but the thread is not even worth it.

wait, you deem the thread unworthy of being unworthy enough? isn't that like a double negative or something?
#24
ShinkuDragon Wrote:i can't believe i am saying this, but for pineapple's sake...
...


...post ponies.

Hahaha, asking me to do it? I don't think so Tim.
#25
Hates gonna hate bro.
I believe you do.
#26
2147483647 Wrote:How is this worse? Is there some kind of unwritten standard to Funhouse threads? I thought this entire subforum was made just for the purpose of spam.

I'll say it since no one else is: generally Funhouse threads are actually made with purpose, or constitute "intelligent spam;" that is, clever/witty spam carefully created for the sole purpose of being funny. They typically don't need companion threads to heighten the joke, though when they do and such threads are executed well, it's all the more hilarious.

What you've been doing the past few days, however, would be pointless and ignored to begin with since the threads aren't that funny, but instead they're increasingly annoying due to your incessant clamoring in each for personal attention. In general, however, what you're doing is being a chronic smart aleck; it's clear you're an intelligent person who understands the rules and even understands the, yes, unwritten standard to Funhouse threads that I stated above. But you're clearly out to to prove something, since poor Harry was probably hurt by some little incident weeks or months ago in the Funhouse, and wants to drive home the idea that this forum is just for spam.

We got all of that out of your first thread. You don't need to make 4059837908750 more over the course of a week to further underscore it. That's why you're getting responses like the ones in this thread, because we're tired of your bullshit.

OB3LISK Wrote:wtp is with people stalking the forum for certain people's posts, just to repost their personal stuff in another thread. I definitely don't agree with that. If someone says something in one thread, don't bring it to another to bash them.

I also mean Frozen night's thread where he posted stuff about 21 and Meta too. wtp.

Please to note I was quite literally copying the style of his post right before that one in which he posted stuff about Sarah to bolster his contentions. But in general that bolded section is lolz. You must really hate prosecuting attorneys who bring in statements the defendant has said at other times unrelated to the trial at hand in order to construct a particular image of said defendant in the eyes of the jury.

Welcome to the real world, brah, where society's perception of you is *gasp* not based off moment-by-moment statements, but by the whole conglomerate of statements made over the course of life.
#27
#28
FrozNlite Wrote:Please to note I was quite literally copying the style of his post right before that one in which he posted stuff about Sarah to bolster his contentions. But in general that bolded section is lolz. You must really hate prosecuting attorneys who bring in statements the defendant has said at other times unrelated to the trial at hand in order to construct a particular image of said defendant in the eyes of the jury.

Welcome to the real world, brah, where society's perception of you is *gasp* not based off moment-by-moment statements, but by the whole conglomerate of statements made over the course of life.

Ehhh I know the style in which you did it and I don't really blame you, I like you, but ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
#29
OB3LISK Wrote:Ehhh I know the style in which you did it and I don't really blame you, I like you, but ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

Canadian.
#30
>clicks thread
>2147483647

AUTIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISM
#31
Khoi Wrote:>clicks thread
>2147483647

AUTIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISM

This made me laugh quite a bit. Am I going to hell?
#32
Cyadd Wrote:This made me laugh quite a bit. Am I going to hell?

You have a ditto staring at you from outside at all times. Isn't that hell.
#33
KhainiWest Wrote:You have a ditto staring at you from outside at all times. Isn't that hell.

pineapple, WHY DID YOU HAVE TO REMIND ME? I WANTS MY BLOOD, I CAN TELL.
#34
FrozNlite Wrote:poor Harry was probably hurt by some little incident weeks or months ago in the Funhouse, and wants to drive home the idea that this forum is just for spam.

Lol.

Khoi Wrote:AUTIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISM

Better than doll-whoring.
#35
2147483647 Wrote:Better than doll-whoring.

Better than autism. At least you can still go out with chicks even if you're doll whoring. If you're autistic, WELP. Good luck with that. Have fun, Harrasson.
#36
Khoi Wrote:Better than autism. At least you can still go out with chicks even if you're doll whoring. If you're autistic, WELP. Good luck with that. Have fun, Harrasson.

Autism is a genetic predisposition. You whore dolls like a girl by choice. There's nothing that says that autists can't go out with chicks. You can't even prove I have autism.
#37
2147483647 Wrote:Autism is a genetic predisposition. You whore dolls like a girl by choice. There's nothing that says that autists can't go out with chicks. You can't even prove I have autism.

[Image: 1297220540202.jpg]

Too lazy to look for your autistic posts. I'll try finding it in my spare time if I'm ever bored, but there are tons.
#38
The logic here is that if you can't prove that I'm autistic, then a chick certainly will do no better at proving such.
#39
2147483647 Wrote:The logic here is that if you can't prove that I'm autistic, then a chick certainly will do no better at proving such.

 Spoiler
#40
Wasnt this guy going to quit SP because of one of the moderators got sick of his pomegranate and demoted himself or something.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)