Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Wow...the MA required to ONE HIT Skelies...
#1
So I was just training at Skelies for kicks, and I realized, you can now ONE HIT both skelies if you have a Ewand 7 + roughly 1215MA...that is insanely nice for higher level AM players. It use to be 100 MA higher at 1315 I believe, so these new AM changes are definitely nice!
Reply
#2
I love them too!! My i/l AM is level 158 atm and I got e-wand 7. I don't have my full gear on me atm but I 1 hit skeles way more often, actually almost all the time now. AMs did get a lot stronger since last patch! I love it!
Reply
#3
Too bad LUKless will be pwnt someday with the new formula Sad
Reply
#4
Pride Wrote:Too bad LUKless will be pwnt someday with the new formula Sad

I most certainly don't find that too bad.
Reply
#5
Eosian Wrote:I most certainly don't find that too bad.

F3. Brah, if only you spent hundreds AP resetting like some of us did...

OT: WOW! That's a lot smaller value than I imagined. It used to be ~1330 magic with the appropriate Elemental Weapon, but hearing that it has dropped over 100 MATK is astounding. Too bad EVERYTHING will change soon =/. Enjoy it while you can!
Reply
#6
FrozNlite Wrote:F3. Brah, if only you spent hundreds AP resetting like some of us did...

That was entirely your choice to spend money attempting to exploit the Then-Mechanics of the game.

I'm sure I spent far more trying to obtain my two staves than any four of you did on AP resets combined.
Reply
#7
Pride Wrote:Too bad LUKless will be pwnt someday with the new formula Sad

Is there any real proof of that, other than that one screenshot of a Bishop missing something?
Another screenshot showed a Bishop with 4 base LUK but a high magic accuracy number.
In another thread, they were saying magic damage was something like (A*INT+B*LUK)*MATT/100, so LUKless shouldn't be much disadvantage, if that is true.

Found it: (I still haven't learned how to pull quotes from other threads)
http://www.southperry.net/showthread.php?t=28250&page=5

Dusk:
" The magician formula seems to be AROUND (3.4*INT + 1.3* LUK) * (MAT/100). Doesn't fit all cases. "
Reply
#8
sounds good to me and my norm luk bishop.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)