2010-05-10, 02:41 AM
FelixTM Wrote:And suddenly people discover the NIGHTMARE FUEL potential of Content Aware.
Lotus fingers/face/boobs/etc is more than enough for me.
|
Content Aware testing
|
|
2010-05-10, 02:41 AM
FelixTM Wrote:And suddenly people discover the NIGHTMARE FUEL potential of Content Aware. Lotus fingers/face/boobs/etc is more than enough for me.
2010-05-10, 03:00 AM
Sn1perJohnE Wrote:@_@ content aware + subtract. TRY IT. + - O.O Anyway, subtract? Subtract what? Subtract selection? Pretty much...what tool/selection are you making?
2010-05-10, 03:13 AM
★★★★★ Wrote:+ - O.O When you have your selection, and going to so content aware, theres a drop down under it that says "normal" change that to subtract. Its making crazy blueness.
2010-05-10, 03:25 AM
imjon Wrote:Don't ask. ![]() I...I'm saving that last one...
2010-05-10, 04:03 AM
Yotsuba Wrote: Hahaha! Umm, trying to remove his face didn't work out too well:
Before
After
2010-05-10, 11:20 AM
imjon Wrote:Don't ask. ...two thoughts came to mind... 1) gives a whole new level to skull fu'cking. 2) ...must tell /d/ of this.
2010-05-10, 07:35 PM
TøbiasBlack Wrote:...two thoughts came to mind...Bahahaha. Rob Wrote: Wt'f Jon, how did that even happen.... ![]() EDIT: ★★★★★ Wrote:Tried doing this alternatively:
Spoiler
2010-05-10, 07:49 PM
TøbiasBlack Wrote:man, you people with photoshop. im stuck with paint.net. =xYou can get a 30-day free trial from Adobe. @_@... I'm not sure what I was trying to accomplish but I'm liking the result:
Before
After
2010-05-10, 07:51 PM
imjon Wrote:You can get a 30-day free trial from Adobe. @_@... i dont want the free trial, i want the whole she-bang.
2010-05-10, 07:51 PM
TøbiasBlack Wrote:i dont want the free trial, i want the whole she-bang. But you can at least play with the content aware-ness. and do you think most of these people have it legally? >_>
2010-05-10, 07:57 PM
imjon Wrote:Hahaha! Least we know you cant make nudes out of bikini girls.... i think?
2010-05-10, 08:00 PM
I'd like to advise anyone who is thinking of posting the results, to not post the results.
2010-05-10, 08:02 PM
Beloved Wrote:Least we know you cant make nudes out of bikini girls.... i think? i did O.O i wont post it, but if you were so inclined i could show you offsite later sometime <<
2010-05-10, 08:07 PM
Rob Wrote: Wt'f Jon, how did that even happen. I'm still not sure myself. I can't reproduce these results no matter what I try. imjon Wrote:Tried doing this alternatively: This actually looks fairly decent, if it wasn't for the doubles. A little work here and there could probably make this look nice. imjon Wrote:I'm not sure what I was trying to accomplish but I'm liking the result:HEARTS EVERYWHERE <3 ganna try this later when I get up from bed. ★★★★★ Wrote:i did O.O i wont post it, but if you were so inclined i could show you offsite later sometime << I think they meant shopping vagoo onto girls, rather than just removing their bottom to see their buttocks.
2010-05-10, 08:29 PM
Yotsuba Wrote:This actually looks fairly decent, if it wasn't for the doubles. A little work here and there could probably make this look nice.1) It was just one giant content aware stroke. if that makes sense. 2) It kept making the lower portions semi-transparent for some reason, lemme know if yours does that too. o_o Attempting to 4kidz-ify FLCL:
Before
After
Yeah, it looks s'hitty. But this was solely done with content aware.
2010-05-10, 08:37 PM
Yotsuba Wrote:I think they meant shopping vagoo onto girls, rather than just removing their bottom to see their buttocks. F4 way to ruin my happy time << |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|