Tyler and Jazeon are just Misunderstood Genuises

Too soon, too offensive, please take down.

Omg this is so nasty.

 Spoiler

At least spoiler it -_-
This thread... these threads... -_-

Is Shenanananininguns the new chinchilla's Nest or w/e?!?!

lol who is tyler if i may ask?

lol who is tyler if i may ask?

A huge piece of pomegranate.

A huge piece of pomegranate.

Well given what is said about me by some of you....I guess I can't take that seriously now can I lol.

Edit: Btw why is pomegranate a negative thing on this forum.....it's a great fruit.

Well given what is said about me by most of you....I guess I can't take that seriously now can I lol.

You kind of lost almost of your credibility with your lolbasilmarket analysis by majority of the forum. "Some" is a better representation of people who think otherwise

Your "gm friend" would know exactly who tyler is, so ask him for his background story n_n, yes he would know.

이거 보고 암걸림
google 암 that will give you the answer -,-
p.s who wants to pay my health insurance?

이거 보고 암걸림

This thread is the fountain of youth

You kind of lost almost of your credibility with your lolbasilmarket analysis by majority of the forum. "Some" is a better representation of people who think otherwise

Perception is everything isn't it.

Well given what is said about me by some of you....I guess I can't take that seriously now can I lol.

This is an irrational statement because it presumes that opinions of some users is analogous to applying reasoning to opinions of all users. First in the sense that opinions of certain community members i.e. KhainiWest's opinion of you is analogous to my opinion of you. This isn't true, because I don't think you're an idiot and I don't care to assess you as a person. I don't care about what type of person you are and I currently don't even want to look into it. Second, it suggests that wrongful criticism of your own character means that everyone on the site also has a wrongful assessment of all peoples' characters. This is irrational because it presumes that one wrong instance is sufficient basis to assume that all determinations will be wrong.

Taking a wrong assessment by certain users on your character and applying that to all instances from all users to all other users is illogical. It's also petty. However, that's not a character assessment. In this case your response comes off as being petty. I believe you even stated earlier that you found some members on the site to be calm and engaging in the thread where you tried to talk about the Rothschild conspiracies. Therefore there's no reason for you to be painting with such a broad brush.

Perception is everything isn't it.

No, accuracy is much more important.

No, accuracy is much more important.

For each individual there will always be bias, accuracy cannot be accomplished by an individual easily, which is why there are such things as population sampling to get a clearer view. But for small groups or individual people, only thing that will matter is their perception.

For each individual there will always be bias, accuracy cannot be accomplished by an individual easily, which is why there are such things as population sampling to get a clearer view. But for small groups or individual people, only thing that will matter is their perception.

When a majority reaches the same conclusion based on the information they are provided, it becomes an accurate assessment. You kind of idiotically made yourself the center of attention by posting that blog with my name on it. People came to me to tell me about it, which led to that image, what like 12 hours later?

Then again I kind of manipulated you to do that just so people would check out how ridiculous your visitor messenger conversations were.

When a majority reaches the same conclusion based on the information they are provided, it becomes an accurate assessment. You kind of idiotically made yourself the center of attention by posting that blog with my name on it. People came to me to tell me about it, which led to that image, what like 12 hours later?

Then again I kind of manipulated you to do that just so people would check out how ridiculous your visitor messenger conversations were.

You like to jump around don't you and dwell on past threads, doesn't really matter to me, in case you had the impression it mattered to me what you guys think, just remember your argument in that other thread about the majority liking Cod or pewdiepie.

I don't understand why each of you try to make it public that you think the other person is the lowest common denominator in virtually almost every thread.

I don't understand why each of you try to make it public that you think the other person is the lowest common denominator in virtually almost every thread.

I admit it happens, I fall for it all the time, his taunts. I really should just try to ignore them.

Actually I've grown bored of this, your reputation has already been determined, nothing else can really be accomplished at this point.

1) It was a blog not a thread.

2) You used the word perception, which is having a cognitive understanding of something, which you can't really have without having all the variables laid out. Therefore your pass behavior matters as it affects your reputation.

3) And should I take your shoes into a losing battle? That argument doesn't work here because I'm talking about your reputation/credibility, which can be accurately measured, fairly easily. The last discussion is about how "sophisticated" those two types of entertainment were, stating that popularity doesn't necessarily mean masterpiece.



Because I always call out stupid.

Night and day......we will never agree and always see each other's arguments as flawed. Truce?