Would you kill a baby human being for $1,000,000,000,000,000?

No.....

A quadrillion dollars? F'uck yeah!

wow, that's a lot of zeros right there. You would be richer than the sum of lots of countries wealth.

I would NEVER kill ANYTHING for all the money in the world coz that's just inhumane >=O

A quadrillion dollars would cause an enormous spike in inflation, destroying the world economy and rendering the winnings nearly worthless.

So no.

A quadrillion dollars would cause an enormous spike in inflation, destroying the world economy and rendering the winnings nearly worthless.

So no.

Only if you spent it all at once. Moderate it's flow and no problem.

you'd be shooting the chinchilla with the most lethal handgun on earth.

CHINCHILLA BABY!???!

(caps)

This trend has degenerated from funny to idiotic and tasteless in the span of three threads.

qft. There's possible, reasonable and intelligent and then there's downright stupid. This is the latter, dont be pissed someone pointed out the "over the top" subject of your thread.

This is the spam section, nothing should be taken seriously.

So you believe this is the spam section and that nothing should be taken seriously (emphasis on you as I believe differently, that there are some things that break all rules, but I digress), yet you take his comment seriously enough to insult him back...Explain that logic to me please. Oh noes, am I going to be the target of Ad hominems now?!

I dont care what others are saying and personally, I dont care how many zeroes there are, Im not selling my conscience/morals. My answer will be the same even if you added ten more zeroes to it or one hundred more zeroes for it. I remember there was a thread about this close to the beginning of the forum where I think a million dollars was on the line and the results were pretty split. Judging from the replies here, I guess adding a crapload of zeroes actually does make a difference, lol.

Edit: @Hazzy-why are you grouping Canada with the commies D:

So you believe this is the spam section and that nothing should be taken seriously (emphasis on you as I believe differently, that there are some things that break all rules, but I digress), yet you take his comment seriously enough to insult him back...Explain that logic to me please. Oh noes, am I going to be the target of Ad hominems now?!

You need to kind of know the TS from bellardia "FM 1" to understand his posts better.

L>janko to make a comment, or manny

Edit: @Hazzy-why are you grouping Canada with the commies D:

We all know what the Canadians are planning.

You guys are all sick bastards! :<

ugh these are just annoying now

This trend has degenerated from funny to idiotic and tasteless in the span of three threads.

Agreed.

No, I wouldn't even have to think about my choice. Just no.

If I didn't get caught sure

You guys are all sick bastards! :<

Thank you.

I wouldn't do it, because of : morals. For you people who have yet to realize the logic of moralism: introducing a quadrillion dollars to the world economy would cause massive inflation and thus make your quadrillion dollars essentially worthless. I would condemn humanity to death, but not a child. Guess my stance on abortion?

I wouldn't do it, because of : morals. For you people who have yet to realize the logic of moralism: introducing a quadrillion dollars to the world economy would cause massive inflation and thus make your quadrillion dollars essentially worthless. I would condemn humanity to death, but not a child. Guess my stance on abortion?

Silly nibs. Abortions have nothing to do with killing babies.

The earth is already overpopulated as it is!

No. But i would stab the starter of the "would you kill __ for $__" threads for free.

on second thought, i voted yes but i guess I wouldn't be able to do it. That's going too far against my strong morals.

Also, this is not /b/ there are rules, of course.