I guess this confirms Twilight point of view.
#1
[color="#000080"]
Huffington Post Wrote:Robert Pattinson covers the tenth anniversary issue of Details with his head nestled next to a vagina, even though inside he tells the magazine he hates them. He also poses with some naked ladies and says that his only relationship of relevance is with his dog. An excerpt:

"I really hate vaginas. I'm allergic to vagina. But I can't say I had no idea, because it was a 12-hour shoot, so you kind of get the picture that these women are going to stay naked after, like, five or six hours. But I wasn't exactly prepared. I had no idea what to say to these girls. Thank God I was hungover."


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/13...61448.html


bahaha[/color]
Reply
#2
Robert Pattinson Wrote:"I really hate vaginas. I'm allergic to vagina."

Fucking LOLed.
Reply
#3
Is this be considered porn since the women are naked?
Reply
#4
2147483647 Wrote:Is this be considered porn since the women are naked?

No. Do you see anything overly sexual in nature?
Reply
#5
Oo if he's gay.
Reply
#6
2147483647 Wrote:Is this be considered porn since the women are naked?

Only if it is the hypotenuse of negative x.
Reply
#7
imjon Wrote:No. Do you see anything overly sexual in nature?

Naked women = something overly sexual.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)