Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
LF> Type 8 Skele Partner
#1
I am a 14x BowMaster. I am looking for a Arch-Mage or Bishop who is willing to do a Type 8 2x Card. I can handle the bottom 2 platforms if you have any friends who would want to train I don't mind doing a 3 person party. I will not allow 3rd person leecher's though. If there's a 3rd person they must be killing on a platform.
Reply
#2
Reference
http://www.southperry.net/forums/showthread.php?t=7276

First you enthusiastically support a thread where you and your friends are equating Bishops and AMs to hackers and botters; now you want to train with Bish/AM. Tongue
Reply
#3
Hypocracy always makes me laugh.
Reply
#4
Quantact Wrote:Reference
http://www.southperry.net/forums/showthread.php?t=7276

First you enthusiastically support a thread where you and your friends are equating Bishops and AMs to hackers and botters; now you want to train with Bish/AM. Tongue

lol, you really love to troll. Please excuse me but I can support which ever thread's I would like. Please make a real class & equate the exp to soloing an attacker to the exp you get as a mage. Then maybe you'll understand why we feel that way about those rankings. You also forgot we kicked alot of regular attacker's off those rankings not all of which are hacker's. So please fix your post.
Reply
#5
DjDisko Wrote:lol, you really love to troll. Please excuse me but I can support which ever thread's I would like. Please make a real class & equate the exp to soloing an attacker to the exp you get as a mage. Then maybe you'll understand why we feel that way about those rankings. You also forgot we kicked alot of regular attacker's off those rankings not all of which are hacker's. So please fix your post.

I AM a real class. Bishop. You came here to find a Bishop or AM to train with. While looking for a Bishop or AM to train with, in the SAME THREAD, you maintain that Bishop/AM are not real classes! Jesus H Jimminy on a pogo stick.

If this is how you talk to the mages on your server, good luck finding one to train with.
Reply
#6
DjDisko Wrote:lol, you really love to troll. Please excuse me but I can support which ever thread's I would like. Please make a real class & equate the exp to soloing an attacker to the exp you get as a mage. Then maybe you'll understand why we feel that way about those rankings. You also forgot we kicked alot of regular attacker's off those rankings not all of which are hacker's. So please fix your post.

im roflcopters @ ur logic
Reply
#7
Try to stick to the main topic, guys. We don't want a flame war here. :<
Reply
#8
Providence Wrote:Try to stick to the main topic, guys. We don't want a flame war here. :<

Thank you. Just because I feel this way & support certain threads on this forum doesn't mean I disrespect other players in game. If you've been to Mardia you would understand where I am coming from most mage classes won't even train with non mage classes in Mardia. We are a large mage server and I am coming to the forums to find a training partner. I doubt you only train with mages in your server if you do it's kinda sad. But in Mardia mage's act like they they are the shyt please excuse my french. But as long as they treat attacking classes like crap here I will continue to support such threads as you previously seen me supporting. Please I just wanted to explain myself now if you'd let me find a training partner. I would very much appreciate it. Happy Mapling! Biggrin

Edit: Please don't report me I just wanted to explain my views and why I posted that.
Reply
#9
How about people that aren't in Mardia stay out of the "LF> training ptner in mardia" threads. That would prevent these meaningless conversations. If you can't train with him, then don't bother reading the thread. Obviously you are here soley to cause drama. We have enough of that as it is.
Reply
#10
OnG yu Hek? Who'se awake for type 8 anyway? isn't that like 6 am?
Reply
#11
DaFrknPope Wrote:OnG yu Hek? Who'se awake for type 8 anyway? isn't that like 6 am?

Rolleyes type 1 maybe then?
Reply
#12
I'll be doing type 8 saturday-friday next week at least, but find skeles highly ineffective with an AM and a BM. You're welcome to join me at Newties though.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply
#13
eos367 Wrote:I'll be doing type 8 saturday-friday next week at least, but I find skeles highly ineffective with an AM and a BM. You're welcome to join me at Newties though.

Ooooh thank you I might just join you if I am not too much of a hassle of course but you did pass my buddies Ted & harry. Frown Ah well its a game and the rule is ppl2pass. Your probably the new Azen/Ian but in mage form maybe who know's to bad you weren't in mardia back then. It would be interesting to see who would win.

 Spoiler
Reply
#14
DjDisko Wrote:You forgot to put an "I" in between "But" and "find" afk being a grammer nazi!

Hmm. You're going to have to tell me which grammar rule that specifically breaks. It'd be a redundant pronoun since the subject hasn't changed between the fragments and my grammar check declared it legal.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply
#15
eos367 Wrote:Hmm. You're going to have to tell me which grammar rule that specifically breaks. It'd be a redundant pronoun since the subject hasn't changed between the fragments and my grammar check declared it legal.

Ah, I see. Well I don't know but it just didn't seem correct with out the "I." You know?
Reply
#16
DjDisko Wrote:Ah, I see. Well I don't know but it just didn't seem correct with out the "I." You know?

I enjoy obscure syntax. It fits the way my mind works.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)