Esoterics

@Kanye West

Stop it

Plus, we all know who runs things behind the scenes.

lol fine i'm done. Was useful though thanks for the replies.

lol fine i'm done. Was useful though thanks for the replies.

Jazeon I know about the rumors behind Goldman Sach executives and prominent figures 'running the government' i.e. Federal Reserve. And have some notion of the speculation with regard to the Rothschild family. But your line of inquiry is still too niche for the general public because these are all lines of thought that require people to put time into reading material that is unconventional and irrelevant to their basic course work. People have no incentive to look into these topics because there is no visible reward and will prioritize their time towards mandatory readings, reading of their interest, or leisure activities to take a break from the education process. Therefore, when you look for people who share this particular niche, it's rare that you will find a hit unless you hit a forum oriented around people who enjoy these types of conversations. The OP isn't an effective method for encouraging people to look into the topic because you don't bother trying to draw people into any of the particular topics you previously mentioned. I imagine though that you were already aware that you weren't catching people in to be interested in this topic given your attitude in this thread. If that's just my cynicism talking then I'm apologize, but this isn't how you encourage people to look deeper into what goes on in our world.

Jazeon I know about the rumors behind Goldman Sach executives and prominent figures 'running the government' i.e. Federal Reserve. And have some notion of the speculation with regard to the Rothschild family. But your line of inquiry is still too niche for the general public because these are all lines of thought that require people to put time into reading material that is unconventional and irrelevant to their basic course work. People have no incentive to look into these topics because there is no visible reward and will prioritize their time towards mandatory readings, reading of their interest, or leisure activities to take a break from the education process. Therefore, when you look for people who share this particular niche, it's rare that you will find a hit unless you hit a forum oriented around people who enjoy these types of conversations. The OP isn't an effective method for encouraging people to look into the topic because you don't bother trying to draw people into any of the particular topics you previously mentioned. I imagine though that you were already aware that you weren't catching people in to be interested in this topic given your attitude in this thread. If that's just my cynicism talking then I'm apologize, but this isn't how you encourage people to look deeper into what goes on in our world.

True but I will just comment and say I wasn't trying to encourage people to look deeper, I had different objectives, which I typed out but then didn't feel like dragging it out knowing how people would respond.

True but I will just comment and say I wasn't trying to encourage people to look deeper, I had different objectives, which I typed out but then didn't feel like dragging it out knowing how people would respond.

Funny thing is in every single one of your posts you do exactly that. I mean do you understand how ridiculous it is to try to lie when the sh`it is just on the previous page?

They are many videos you can find on the workings of these people, i'm sure any of you being learned in the ways of the internet can find them if you choose

Rather if you are interested, you would have to spend some time researching for yourself if you don't know already

I want people to do research for themselves, then pose their opinions

Funny thing is in every single one of your posts you do exactly that. I mean do you understand how ridiculous it is to try to lie when the sh`it is just on the previous page?

Sigh your bigotry is astounding, you remind me of certain females I have come across. Your failure to understand ones motives and objectives does not mean that yours are right or they are at fault. Stop being so narrow minded and self righteous for a change and you might be surprised at the results. You assume too much.

Let me ask just for the sake of trying to be civil with you, what do you hope to accomplish by going down this line of reasoning? For me to say "dam you caught me i was lying and bsing and i don't have a clue about what i'm talking about?"

Sigh your bigotry is astounding, you remind me of certain females I have come across.

And you remind me of most basil users, dosen't really provide anything to the conversation? I'm not sure how you refer to this as bigotry, you say one thing, I correct you, does that make people such as editors or teachers profession a form of bigotry?

You said carbon dating isn't accurate, your evidence you provided is wrong, it is your opinion, but an opinion can be wrong, not because my opinion is different, but because evidence backs it up. You said you weren't trying to get people to research, yet there are 3 instances demonstrated. This isn't bigotry, this is you upset because you're wrong, it's facts being presented not perspectives.

Your failure to understand ones motives and objectives does not mean that yours are right or they are at fault.

There is no failure to understand here. My assumption is you're trying to create a facade to save the embarrassment you have suffered twice now. Did I actually say that? No, that is an assumption. What I said was you claimed one thing, yet proof from the previous page shows a clear contradiction. There is no other intepretation besides what was presented. We aren't arguing perspectives, we never argued perspectives.

Stop being so narrow minded and self righteous for a change and you might be surprised at the results. You assume too much.

I didn't assume anything. Look, when you stop posting stuff that is incredibly inaccurate, I won't take the time to correct you. It's not narrow minded or self righteous for me to point out these things to you, for you, they may as well be epiphanies.

Let me ask just for the sake of trying to be civil with you, what do you hope to accomplish by going down this line of reasoning? For me to say "dam you caught me i was lying and bsing and i don't have a clue about what i'm talking about?"

Frankly that's all you could say at this point. I'm just pointing out your contradictions, how you want to save what little credibility you have left is on you.