2015-04-29, 07:50 PM
Would it be correct to assume that if you have 100% critical chance that your range is the figure which accounts for your regular range combined with the boost gained from critical damage since you receive those 100% of the time?
I'm trying to figure out how to read range/damage calculations in a way where I can compare myself to other classes and associated range related milestone markers...but having 100% critical chance and being an angelic buster with a huge boost to min and max critical damage leaves me unsure which is more or less accurate. I feel as though in comparing stats the critical damage should be accounted in range, especially if you have 100% critical chance and the associated massive boost that AB's utilize, afterall I'm certain Nexon considers this when balancing the classes...but I can't figure it out beyond that and really don't know how to make comparisons between the range of one class and an AB.
Thanks for any help.
I'm trying to figure out how to read range/damage calculations in a way where I can compare myself to other classes and associated range related milestone markers...but having 100% critical chance and being an angelic buster with a huge boost to min and max critical damage leaves me unsure which is more or less accurate. I feel as though in comparing stats the critical damage should be accounted in range, especially if you have 100% critical chance and the associated massive boost that AB's utilize, afterall I'm certain Nexon considers this when balancing the classes...but I can't figure it out beyond that and really don't know how to make comparisons between the range of one class and an AB.
Thanks for any help.

